As organizations modernize their infrastructure, migrating from traditional datacenters to cloud-native platforms, network connectivity becomes a central architectural decision. And on Google Cloud, one of the most common debates among experienced leaders is:
Should we use Interconnect or VPN to connect our on-prem or WAN to the cloud?
This isn’t a simple pricing comparison. It’s a decision that impacts:
If your business runs mission-critical systems, builds multi-region architectures, or supports global customers, choosing the right connection method directly affects performance, downtime risk, and operational experience.
Let’s break this down deeply and practically.
In the early cloud days, enterprises used VPN primarily as a secure tunnel from on-prem to cloud. It was simple, inexpensive, and enough for low-traffic workloads.
But as cloud adoption matured, businesses started pushing far more demanding requirements:
At this stage, VPN suddenly becomes a bottleneck.
This is where Interconnect—Google’s private, high-speed connection—enters the story.
But choosing between the two depends not only on speed, but also your business model, your workloads, and your long-term roadmap.
Before diving into architecture decisions, let’s define them side-by-side.
What Is a Google Cloud VPN?
A secure IPSec tunnel that connects your on-prem/branch to Google Cloud.
GCP offers:
What Is Google Cloud Interconnect?
A high-bandwidth, private physical connection between your network and Google.
Two types:
1. Dedicated Interconnect
A physical port directly into Google’s edge, offering:
2. Partner Interconnect
Connectivity via a Google Cloud partner:
Interconnect doesn’t send traffic over the public internet—it uses Google’s private backbone.
Latency isn’t only a number—it’s a business outcome.
For some businesses, shaving 20–30 milliseconds doesn’t matter.
For others, it changes everything.
Let’s compare.
VPN Latency
Real-world ranges: 30–150 ms, depending on geography.
VPN latency is rarely stable because you don’t control the network path.
Interconnect Latency
Real-world ranges: 2–20 ms between your datacenter and Google’s PoPs.
Mission-critical latency matters when you’re running:
If latency changes your performance metrics or customer experience, Interconnect is the solution.
Throughput determines how much data you can move—and how fast.
VPN Throughput
VPN is constrained by:
HA VPN improves reliability, but throughput still tops out at:
Sufficient for:
Not suitable for:
Interconnect Throughput
Dedicated Interconnect offers:
In high-throughput architectures, Interconnect becomes critical:
Interconnect isn’t just faster—it makes large-scale architectures operationally feasible.
VPN Reliability
VPN depends on:
HA VPN significantly improves uptime with:
But VPN is still subject to the public internet’s unpredictability.
Interconnect Reliability
Dedicated Interconnect offers:
When your network cannot go down, Interconnect wins by a wide margin.
6. Security: Both Are Secure, but Not Equal
VPN Security
Ideal for secure tunnels, but not ideal for highly sensitive workloads.
Interconnect Security
For regulated industries—finance, healthcare, telecom—Interconnect simplifies compliance.
Cost is a major factor, but the decision shouldn’t be based purely on price.
VPN Costs
Very low.
Typically:
Best for small teams, development workloads, or low-throughput apps.
Interconnect Costs
Higher upfront, but not always expensive long-term.
Costs include:
But Interconnect often reduces egress costs compared to public internet pricing.
For companies moving petabytes annually, Interconnect is often cheaper than VPN.
You can’t choose correctly without looking at practical scenarios.
When VPN is the Better Choice
1. Small or early-stage deployments
Proof of concept
Development environments
Light workloads
2. Remote offices or branch connections
Low bandwidth
Event-driven workloads
User authentication traffic
3. Backups and administrative connections
Monitoring
Control-plane operations
Occasional data movement
If cost is the biggest concern and performance isn’t critical—VPN works.
When Interconnect is the Better Choice
1. High-throughput hybrid workloads
You need consistent bandwidth for:
2. Latency-sensitive architectures
Such as:
3. Hybrid transactional databases
For example:
4. Compliance or regulatory requirements
Interconnect simplifies:
5. Large enterprises with strict SLAs
If uptime is contractual, Interconnect gives control and predictability.
Many mature organizations use both Interconnect and VPN.
Typical pattern:
This creates a hybrid network with:
This is the architecture recommended for mission-critical workloads.
10. Making the Decision: A Simple Framework for Leaders
To choose the right connectivity method, ask:
A. What is your required throughput?
< 5 Gbps → VPN may be fine
5 Gbps → Interconnect recommended
20 Gbps → Interconnect required
100 Gbps → Dedicated Interconnect only
B. How sensitive are you to latency?
Latency-critical workloads always prefer Interconnect.
C. How much data will move between on-prem and GCP?
Petabyte-scale = Interconnect
Moderate or unpredictable = Possibly VPN + caching
D. Do you have compliance obligations?
Private connectivity often simplifies audits.
E. How mature is your cloud environment?
Proof of concept → VPN
Enterprise migration → Interconnect
Two-way hybrid architecture → Interconnect + VPN failover
Choosing between Interconnect and VPN isn’t just a networking choice—it’s a strategic infrastructure decision that shapes your cloud architecture, performance, and operational resilience.
VPN is flexible, quick, inexpensive, and perfect for low-volume or development scenarios.
Interconnect is built for speed, low latency, reliability, and high-throughput hybrid architectures.
For modern enterprises aiming for predictable performance, strong SLAs, and future scalability, Interconnect becomes the clear backbone. And when combined with HA VPN for redundancy, it forms a rock-solid connectivity strategy that supports mission-critical workloads on Google Cloud.